Book Review: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? - Philip K. Dick

Title: DO ANDROIDS DREAM OF ELECTRIC SHEEP?
Publisher: Gollancz
Author: Philip K. Dick
Edition released: 2007
ISBN: 978-0-575-07993-9
214 pages
Reviewed by: Adam Donnison


Image from Amazon

This is a seminal work. DO ANDROIDS DREAM OF ELECTRIC SHEEP? went on to become the movie Blade Runner, released just months after Philip K. Dick's death at the age of 53. Indeed, at nearly one movie every 3 years, Dick is only surpassed by Stephen King in the rate of cinematic adaptation. Despite this he was virtually ignored during his life, a travesty that in the 25th year since his death, Gollancz have rectified by re-releasing many of his works.

Think of the best science fiction movies of all time, and chances are you will list more than one inspired by Dick's work. Blade Runner, Total Recall, A Scanner Darkly, Minority Report, Next, the list goes on. Lovers of the films will find new depths, and nuances in the original stories that make them well worth searching out. A science fiction collection without a Dick novel fails the basic test.

DO ANDROIDS DREAM OF ELECTRIC SHEEP? is set some time after World War Terminus spread its deadly radioactive dust over the planet, making it hostile to all life. The lucky have escaped to the colonies on Mars. Those unwilling to go are persuaded by the availability of androids, near perfect copies of humans that are almost the perfect servants.

Rick Deckard can not emigrate, his job as a bounty hunter means he is tied to the planet. So he, like most of his "regular" neighbours, yearns to own a real live creature. His own sheep has died and he has replaced it with a convincing electric model. Things would have to look up for Deckard to be able to afford anything like the horse his neighbour owns. He'd need a break, some androids to try and infiltrate the earth, passing themselves off as regulars. But on this earth, even humans that can no longer reproduce true to type are discarded, ignored, labelled as "specials". Androids are illegal and the job of the bounty hunter is to "retire" them, kill them.

When one of 8 escaped androids kills the senior bounty hunter, Deckard is given a chance to make enough money to fulfil his dream. 6 androids survive, and he has to track them down. But these androids are of an advanced type, the Nexus-6, and are almost perfect copies. Deckard needs to be sure that his empathy test is good enough to detect the difference between android and human. The Rosen Corporation is asked to provide him with test subjects, and Deckard and his faith in his test, and indeed in his job, are shaken.

Deckard's chase of the androids, his relationship with Rachel Rosen, the android "niece" of the owner of Rosen Corporation, and his internal anguish at the use of empathy to both unite and control humanity are explored in this fascinating and thought provoking piece.

DO ANDROIDS DREAM OF ELECTRIC SHEEP? is jam-packed with ideas, far more than lesser writers could possibly hope to cram into such a slim volume. Here you will find ideas of religion and mind control, what it means to be human, love and yearning, arrogance and denial, and yet a fast flowing and truly engaging story.

4 comments

Comment from: Wally [Visitor]  
Wally

One of the greatest writers of science fiction. The short story made into Total Recall is far better then the movie, for example. Phillip K Dick’s writing is full of inspirational ideas and emotions. You can do alot worse then that.

12/06/07 @ 12:43
Comment from: [Member]
aj

“We can remember it for you wholesale” was the story made into Total Recall.

I find that a lot of Dick’s writings work on a level that is far too subtle to make it to the big screen without losing something. Blade Runner, for instance, is a great movie. There is no denying that. But the entire point of the movie is shifted somewhat from what I perceive to be the point of the book. Of course, I could have misread the book, but the focus just seems to miss out on the entire empathy as control vs. empathy as definition that seems to be the heart of the book.

12/06/07 @ 13:19
Comment from: [Member]
aj

I’ve just decided to re-watch Blade Runner, as I was thinking about some of the differences between it and the book, and the differences are truly startling, and they make a big difference to the meaning of the story. I guess I should point out that the version I’m looking at is the “Director’s Cut", so there are a few differences there.

While Blade Runner is a visual splendour, it, I believe, devalues the story by its changing of some basic elements.

The first impression is the influence on Ridley Scott by William Gibson. The melding of American and Japanese culture is taken straight out of Gibson’s work. This isn’t a major point, I guess, but it colours the entire movie. Every scene is replete with Gibson-esque imagery.

Then there is the entire reason for Deckard’s involvement. In the book he is the second string, waiting on Dave Holden to give him some crumbs so he can help his wife’s depression, but in the film he is the hard-boiled, single detective who has walked away from it all, only to be brought back because Dave is killed. This is classic American-noir detective fiction. Raymond Chandler could have written the opening scenes.

In the book, Rachel seduces Deckard in order to try and give him empathy towards the androids, so that he is reluctant to kill them. In the film, Rachel becomes a fugitive that Deckard seduces, and then tries to run away with, missing the entire point of the use of empathy as control. The ignoring of the Mercerism religion is convenient in this regard as well.

There are a number of changes that are forgivable in the name of cinematic interest, like the android opera singer becoming the exotic dancer, but the death of the final replicant is taken straight out of H.G. Wells “War of the Worlds". Homage, perhaps, but completely missing the point besides.

The film is great, don’t get me wrong. But it isn’t the same story, and I’d really urge people to try the book for a fresh look.

12/06/07 @ 22:08
Comment from: Gene [Visitor]
Gene

What does Philip K. Dick wishes to say about the american society in 1968? can anyone tell me? I am doing a research of the book..

08/12/08 @ 23:07


Form is loading...